Immigration to Canada | Refugees and Protected Persons | Applying from Inside Canada
Applications for protection are determined by the Refugee Protection Division (RPD) of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB), a quasi-judicial, arm’s length tribunal of the federal government.
Applicants for protected person status who have applied at a port of entry or inside Canada must first be determined to be eligible to claim refugee protection. Certain individuals are not eligible to have their claims for protection determined by the IRB.
Section 101 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act states that the following persons are ineligible to have their claim for protection referred to the RPD:
-
refugee protection has been conferred on the claimant under this Act;
-
a claim for refugee protection by the claimant has been rejected by the Board;
-
a prior claim was determined to be ineligible for referral to the RPD, or to have been withdrawn or abandoned;
-
the claimant has been recognized as a Convention refugee by a country other than Canada and can be sent or returned to that country;
-
the claimant came directly or indirectly to Canada from a country designated by the Regulations, other than a country of his/her nationality or former habitual residence; or
-
the claimant has been determined to be inadmissible on grounds of security, violating human or international rights, serious criminality or organized criminality, except for persons who are inadmissible solely on the grounds of paragraph 35(1)(c).
Mamann Sandaluk recommends that claims for protection be made at the first opportunity. Otherwise, the opportunity to fully present the claim might be compromised. We also recommend that claimants obtain legal assistance as soon as possible, as mistakes made early in the process can turn out to be very harmful to the application later on.
Applications for protection must be presented with considerable care. There are important deadlines that must be met. Even very strong cases must be properly supported by documentation and carefully presented in a manner readily understood by Canadian decision makers.
Applications for protection often involve complex legal issues and it is important to be represented by a skilled advocate who is experienced at representing clients before the IRB.
Further Reading
Application refused? – Federal Court
Permanent residence – Humanitarian and Compassionate Application
Refugees and Protected persons - Pre-removal Risk Assessment
List of countries Canada is currently not removing to
South African refugee could see reversal of fortunes, September 8th, 2009
No declaration that U.S. is safe for Canada’s refugee claimants – Guidy Mamann, July 14th, 2008
All eyes on refugee ruling – Guidy Mamann, January 21st, 2008
Agreement struck down – Guidy Mamann, December 3rd, 2007
Suing for delay is risky – Guidy Mamann, October 22nd, 2007
Aid worker a smuggler? Guidy Mamann, October 1st, 2007
Economic refugees: Here we go again -- Guidy Mamann, September 24th, 2007
Lawyer a no-show at refugee hearing – Guidy Mamann, June 18th, 2007
Refugee obligations self-imposed – Guidy Mamann, February 12th, 2007
Refugee judges lack experience – Guidy Mamann, October 9th, 2006
Federal Court can stay execution of removal order – Part 3 – Guidy Mamann, May 8th, 2006
When foreigners are told to leave Canada – Part 1 – Guidy Mamann, April 24th, 2006
Refugee review board made unfair biased ruling – Guidy Mamann, April 3rd, 2006
Bill changes safe country status – Guidy Mamann, March 6th, 2006
Refugees with no fear – Guidy Mamann, October 17th, 2006
Refugees in Sudan beyond reach Guidy Mamann, June 13th, 2005
Read fine print to avoid deportation – Guidy Mamann, April 18th, 2005
Federal judge slams refugee board’s actions – Guidy Mamann, April 4th, 2005
US Soldier right to expect refuge – Guidy Mamann, March 29th, 2005
Students take risk in claiming refugee status – Guidy Mamann, March 7th, 2005
What’s our position towards refugees – Guidy Mamann, October 18th 2004













